<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pool Cue Review &#187; Desperado cues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.poolcuereview.com/category/desperado-cues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.poolcuereview.com</link>
	<description>So Its Pool Cues You Be Wanting...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Outlaw vs. Desperado</title>
		<link>http://www.poolcuereview.com/2008/09/20/outlaw-vs-desperado/</link>
		<comments>http://www.poolcuereview.com/2008/09/20/outlaw-vs-desperado/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Desperado cues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlaw cues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pool cue review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.poolcuereview.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the saddest trends I’ve been noticing as of late is the complete lack of anything “new” in the billiards industry.  I’m not talking about the whole low deflection shaft thing, (although it seems that everyone and their uncle is now making a low deflection shaft) I’m talking purely about design.  Making pool cues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.poolcuereview.com/2008/09/20/outlaw-vs-desperado/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
